I discuss my thoughts on the air so to speak on the recent NPI conference. Up until around the 4 minute mark is background information, skip to that in order to get directly to my thoughts on the subject.
I address issues like controlled opposition theories, marketing our message, and strategies in dealing with the mainstream media.
I apologize for the poor audio, I’ve recently discovered some deficiencies with my microphone but I felt the need to provide my thoughts regardless.
The few liberals with enough foresight to see where the nation is headed have stopped crying and rioting long enough to cry for “healing”.
“It’s time for peace! Please ignore the fact we’re rioting! Did you hear about that hate crime that you already confirmed is a hoax? Do you repudiate…”
This isn’t new; this is the natural response of snakes, liars, and cowards. For eight years our way of life, our religious beliefs, our desire for prosperity, etc has all been swept aside and condemned. “It’s racist, it’s Nazism!”
We were told it was the end of the right, the end of heritage, even the end of whites as a race. We were told to stand aside, as the better and more virtuous races (who by nature of their natural virtue couldn’t possibly be racist by saying such a thing) were brought to replace us as opposed to live among and harmonize with us.
Why on earth do these delusional people think we should stop now? Do they not understand the momentum that has been created? Are they so clueless as to see the monster born of their stupidity and self righteous arrogance? No one but they know what pitiful hope they have of achieving whatever this is designed to do, and it doesn’t matter.
Our single response must be “No, we will not. It is our turn to make the nation in our image and you will be made to comply so long as you live under us. By the way, we’re not going anywhere.”
Don’t forget the snakes and traitors that will sell you and themselves out for a bit of money or social prestige. After all, they certainly won’t forget you.
Globalist Libertarians and Nationalist Libertarians have had it out again this year, which isn’t meaningful to many people outside of libertarian circles. Immigration is always the primary focal point of this debate, which is why it can provide meaning and insight to people outside of Libertarian circles as immigration effects virtually everyone in a country.
- Libertarians assert that regulations, centralized government, frivolous government agencies/services, welfare, etc are morally and economically fallible, harmful, and ultimately dangerous.
- Immigrants as a whole, but particularly from the third world vote for and take advantage of these policies in ratios greater than the average American.
- Each vote of an immigrant cancels out that of a native born citizen with history in the nation.
- Therefore, immigration disproportionately benefits those who wish to increase state authority and intervention.
This is a simple and easy demolition of the belief that immigrants are better for the economy under our current laws concerning immigration, citizenship, and voting.
I think it is the best response to the common deduction Globalist Libertarians put forward, which is as follows;
Immigrants take $4 billion in welfare, and provide $44 billion in created wealth, thus immigration is a net positive.
This isn’t even sound on the surface, as it makes no division of wealth created/taken on things like gender, country of origin, etc.
However it is the common argument they present, making this rebuttal commonly effective and therefore useful. This also avoids the complex topics of human biodiversity and r/K selection, often deemed too complicated and offensive to discuss publicly.
“Will you absolutely accept the results of this election?”
It was a silly question to ask mere days after Project Veritas confirmed voter fraud was being coordinated. Trump declined to answer, prompting outrage from the Clinton Camp.
“He’s attacking our democracy!” After all, democracy is legitimate if someone’s cheating, right? Thankfully they didn’t succeed and Trump has indeed accepted the results (Clinton has as well, to provide credit where credit is due).
Now in the aftermath of Trump’s victory the Left is in shambles. The response to this victory over them has been protest, anger, infantile hatred, and outright violence. Indeed these “protesters” have been shipped all over the country to intimidate, harass, and assault others. The hideous video of an old, white Trump supporter stumbling as blows rained down on him from a few dark complexioned youths (not to be confused with tanned German men of course) has been making rounds around the web.
Why do they do this? We on the right are constantly berated for our “hateful” and “dangerous” rhetoric for assuming there are only two genders or recoiling at the prospect of handing off half of our income to the state. We’re told our speeches are literally violence should we dare to criticize college millennials. It’s becoming increasingly clear that the 21st century American Left holds no standards to their own, and are no different than the Stalinists and Maoists that preceded them.
Believe it or not the Left has been gearing up to excuse this kind of behavior for several months now. The reason they designate speech as violence is to blur the boundary between words and actions. This must be understood; dumb people are better at hitting than thinking. Their response to events they dislike will follow that model whether we of the New Right are prepared to engage them or not.
Don’t get caught unprepared.
I found two things of note the day after the election beyond my general happiness in response to the results.
The total reversal of leftist propaganda I found rather startling. The immediate response was to facilitate “healing”. Anyone who’s been paying attention to the general leftist elements of culture know they have no such intentions at hand. This is a plea for mercy.
The second thing I found genuinely surprising was the total bafflement present on all the faces of the media across the board. “How could this be”, their dumbfounded expressions read. Apparently expressing hatred for the normal people of the nation is a poor election strategy.